Donald Trump’s resounding election victory is dismantling the Democrats’ legal onslaught against him. For years, they’ve relied on lawfare to bog down the former president, launching federal and state cases in what many see as politically motivated schemes.
But now, with Trump preparing to retake the White House, these plans are falling apart. Federal cases are being tossed left and right, leaving only the hollow remnants of a desperate campaign to stop him.
Yet, one stubborn case lingers in New York, led by a biased liberal judge and District Attorney Alvin Bragg. This state-level lawsuit is as baseless as the others, but its purpose isn’t justice—it’s delay.
Democrats know they can’t touch Trump now, but by dragging out this sham trial, they aim to distract him and slow his momentum. It’s a classic stall tactic, and it reeks of sour grapes.
Attorneys for President-elect Donald Trump are requesting permission to file a motion to dismiss the business records case in Manhattan, contending that the U.S. Constitution mandates its “[i]mmediate dismissal.”…
Blanche and Bove point to the reported off-ramping of two separate cases against Trump at the federal level now that he is president-elect and said the same must happen in the business records case brought by Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg’s office. [Source: Breitbart]
The New York case against Trump, spearheaded by Alvin Bragg, hit a significant roadblock this week. Trump’s legal team argued that the case should be dismissed outright, calling it an overreach with no legal merit.
Bragg’s office, surprisingly, requested a four-year freeze on sentencing, effectively kicking the case down the road for Trump’s entire presidency.
Judge Juan Merchan has yet to rule on Trump’s motions to dismiss, but he did adjourn the sentencing hearing originally scheduled for November 26. The move came without explanation, fueling speculation that even Merchan recognizes the weakness of the case.
The irony here is hard to miss. By requesting a freeze, Bragg’s team essentially admitted they don’t have the goods to take Trump down now—or ever.
They’re hoping to punt this losing battle into the distant future, but Trump’s team isn’t letting up. This legal drama, much like the others Democrats have staged, seems destined to collapse under the weight of its own absurdity.
For Trump, this is more than just a win in court; it’s proof that the left’s strategy of lawfare is failing. Federal cases have been dismissed, and the Manhattan DA’s request to delay this one is a tacit admission of defeat.
The American people can see through these desperate attempts to derail Trump’s agenda, and they’ve made their voices heard by electing him in a landslide.
Trump’s election has shifted the political and legal landscape in dramatic ways. Democrats’ weaponization of the justice system is losing steam, exposing their tactics for what they are: partisan attacks masquerading as legal battles.
The New York case is a perfect example. With no real substance to back it up, it now sits frozen, awaiting an inevitable dismissal.
Meanwhile, Trump’s return to the White House promises to deliver on his agenda of draining the swamp and restoring faith in America’s institutions. The collapse of these sham cases is just the beginning.
As Trump prepares to take office, the left’s lawfare strategy has been exposed and rendered powerless.
Author: Kit Fargo
